Search Results for "transferee liability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "transferee liability"

187 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 187 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from Regional Director.

19 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a petition filed by Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor) and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee) seeking sanction of a scheme of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Amalgamation of Five Transferor Companies with Unichem Laboratories Limited. Scheme held fair and reasonable under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956, despite shareholder objection.

12 Jul 2012

The judgment concerns five Company Scheme Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 80, 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Monarch Research and Brokerage Private Limited and Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited with Networth Stock Broking Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 — Objection by Gold Castle Realtor Dismissed as Not a Creditor or Member.

7 Aug 2014

The judgment concerns two Company Scheme Petitions (CSP 575/2012 and CSP 576/2012) filed by Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited (2nd Transferor Com...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Transferee Colleges' Fee Claims in Relocated Medical Students Case — Selvam Trust Directed to Pay Fee Difference. Equitable Apportionment of Financial Liability Ordered to Prevent Unjust Enrichment of Defaulter Trust and Ensure Compensation for Education Imparted by Transferee Colleges.

14 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court addressed the financial liability arising from the relocation of 123 MBBS students from Sardar Rajas Medical College (SRMCH), run by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

31 Mar 2016

The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Filing of Revised Income Tax Returns After Due Date in Amalgamation Case — Holds That NCLT-Approved Scheme Overrides Procedural Timelines Under Income Tax Act. Clause 64(c) of the Scheme Permitting Revised Returns Has Statutory Force and Department Cannot Reject Them as Invalid.

18 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by M/s Dalmia Power Limited and M/s Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited against the judgment of the Division Be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preemptive Purchase Orders Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Difference in Valuation Below 15% Threshold. The Appropriate Authority's orders under section 269UD(1) were set aside as the difference between fair market value and apparent consideration was less than 15%, and no opportunity of hearing was given.

23 Dec 2011

The petitioners, Pandharinath Bhikaji Telge and Dattaram Bhikaji Telge, were owners of a property in Chembur, Mumbai. They entered into an agreement t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Legal Heirs and Grants Leave to Continue Proceedings in Specific Performance Suit. Transfer of Property During Pendency of Lis Pendens Does Not Affect Rights of Parties Under Order 22 Rule 4 and Rule 10 CPC.

27 Aug 2014

The Plaintiff, Nirav Deepak Modi, filed Suit No. 1166 of 2006 for specific performance of an agreement for sale concerning a suit property. The suit w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Damages Levy Case Under Section 14B of EPF Act — Delay in Payment of Provident Fund Dues Attracts Damages Irrespective of Financial Difficulties. Financial Hardship Not a Valid Defence for Delayed Provident Fund Contributions Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

22 Jun 2005

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) appealed against a Single Judge order that set aside notices/orders dated 17.7.1990 and 24.6.1992 levy...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)