Search Results for "trade unions act 1926"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "trade unions act 1926"

125 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Registration of Advocates' Federation as Trade Union Under Trade Unions Act, 1926. Advocates' Association Held Eligible for Registration as Trade Union Under Section 2(h) of the Act, as Definition Does Not Require Members to Be 'Workmen' Under Industrial Disputes Act.

11 Aug 2017

The petitioner, I. A. Saiyed, a practicing advocate registered with the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Five Workmen as Protected Workmen — Trade Union Must Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to Claim Protection Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that an unregistered trade union cannot seek declaration of its office bearers as protected workmen under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Nov 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, a public limited company running amusement parks, challenged an order dated 16.09.2017 passed by the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Union's Locus Standi in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Transfer Orders Quashed as Union Need Not Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to File Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

25 Jun 2018

The case involves a challenge by M/s Prabhat Dairy Ltd and others (the employer) against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane, which allowed a co...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court’s Recognition of Trade Union Under MRTU & PULP Act. Recognition Granted Based on Retrospective Membership Payments Raises Question of Legal Validity.

3 May 2006

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 3 March 1998 of the Industrial Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Registrar's Refusal to Issue Consent Certificate for Trade Union Election Dispute. Registrar's power under Section 28-1A of Trade Union Act, 1926 is quasi-judicial and requires application of mind; mere allegations of fraud without prima facie evidence do not warrant consent.

9 Dec 2020

The petitioners, members of Respondent No.2 Trade Union, challenged the order dated 05/02/2020 of the Registrar of Trade Unions (Respondent No.1) reje...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act — Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld. The court held that the Industrial Court correctly declared the first respondent-union as the recognized union, as it had higher membership and the verification was properly conducted.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Registration of Trade Union with Deceptive Name. Registration of 'AITUC Hawkers Union' Quashed as It Likely to Deceive Public and Infringe on Petitioner's Rights Under Trade Unions Act, 1926.

30 Aug 2005

The petitioner, All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC), Maharashtra State Branch, is a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, regist...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Registrar's Cancellation of Trade Union Registration for Non-Compliance with Section 28-A of Trade Unions Act, 1926. Failure to maintain proper membership register and file annual returns justified cancellation despite opportunity of hearing.

25 Mar 2013

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Mumbai Taximen's Union and its Secretary challenging the order of the Deputy Registrar of...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)