Search Results for "trade union activities"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "trade union activities"

825 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 825 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Appeal Against Termination Without Enquiry, Upholding Misconduct Findings and Denying Backwages. Court Holds That Misconduct Proved Under Section 11-A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Does Not Entitle Workman to Backwages for Period Before Labour Court's Finding.

19 Jan 2005

The case involved an industrial dispute between a workman and his employer. The appellant, a workman, was terminated from service on 28 June 1979 alon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act — Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld. The court held that the Industrial Court correctly declared the first respondent-union as the recognized union, as it had higher membership and the verification was properly conducted.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Examining the scope of Industrial Court’s jurisdiction in unfair labor practice complaints under MRTU & PULP Act in the context of employer-employee relationships.

22 Oct 2024

Acts and Sections Discussed: Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices (MRTU & PULP) Act, 1971 - Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Registrar's Cancellation of Trade Union Registration for Non-Compliance with Section 28-A of Trade Unions Act, 1926. Failure to maintain proper membership register and file annual returns justified cancellation despite opportunity of hearing.

25 Mar 2013

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by the Mumbai Taximen's Union and its Secretary challenging the order of the Deputy Registrar of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Five Workmen as Protected Workmen — Trade Union Must Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to Claim Protection Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that an unregistered trade union cannot seek declaration of its office bearers as protected workmen under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Nov 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, a public limited company running amusement parks, challenged an order dated 16.09.2017 passed by the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Provide Facilities to Recognised Union Under MRTU and PULP Act. Recognised Union Entitled to Same Facilities as Unrecognised Union Under Section 20 of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

31 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Tata Memorial Centre, challenged an order dated 31.8.2005 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No. 919 of 2001. The respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Rejection of Workman's Complaint Seeking Cancellation of Recognition of Union. Individual Employee Cannot Initiate Proceedings Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act.

3 May 2018

The dispute arose out of a complaint filed by an individual workman, Bharat Jijaba Shinde, purportedly on behalf of 309 out of 400 employees of Force ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Be Represented by Trade Union Office Bearer in Domestic Inquiry — Vice-President of Union Held Entitled to Represent Member Under Section 22(2)(c) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Statutory Right Cannot Be Restricted by Union Constitution.

22 Nov 2006

The petitioner, Dastgir Alam Mulla, a plant-operator employed by Mysore Petrochemicals Limited since 1992, was suspended on 29-11-2004 and a chargeshe...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)