Search Results for "tourist bus operator"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Award Function with Intermittent Performances. Sponsorship Amount for Invitee-Only Event Constitutes Payment for Admission Under Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act.

The petitioner, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organized the 'APSARA' award function on 21st January 2006 at Jams...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Single Judge's Directions on Vehicle Seizure under Motor Vehicles Act. Court Holds that Directions Were Reiteration of Rule 202-B and Custody Cannot Be Given to Parallel Operators Including State Transport Corporations.

The respondent, a tourist bus operator with 265 buses, filed writ petitions seeking a direction that his vehicles not be seized except by following th...