Search Results for "tin sheet roof"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "tin sheet roof"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stop-Work Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act for Tenantable Repairs — Replacement of Rusted GI Sheets Held Not to Require Prior Permission. Tenantable repairs of replacing old GI sheets with new ones of same nature do not constitute erection of building or work under Section 354A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and notice issued without hearing is violative of natural justice.

13 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Indu Oil And Soap Co., is the owner of a property at 5-A, Hansraj Lane, Byculla (E), Mumbai, where it operates a factory for manufactu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenants for Unauthorized Permanent Structure Under Bombay Rent Act. Tenants' Construction of Wooden Rafters and Tin Sheet Roof Without Landlord's Written Consent Constitutes Permanent Structure Under Section 13(1)(b) of Bombay Rents, Hotel Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

8 Aug 2005

The dispute involved tenants who had replaced the original flat roof of the rented premises with 12 wooden rafters and 18 tin sheet roofs without obta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of MMC Act, 1888 — Terrace Room Protected But Three Sheds Not Entitled to Injunction. The court held that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favour protecting the three sheds from demolition.

7 Feb 2005

The appellant, Abhinandan Commercial Centre Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court dated 13th January 2005, which partly ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Absence of Theft and Common Object. Removal of Tin Sheets from Grampanchayat Property Does Not Constitute Dacoity Under Section 395 IPC as Essential Ingredients of Theft and Dishonest Intention Are Missing.

11 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 12th October 2001 passed by the Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.89 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Orders for Unauthorized Demolition and Reconstruction of Suit Premises. Tenant's Act of Demolishing Entire Structure and Erecting New Construction Without Landlord's Consent Constitutes Material Alteration and Forfeiture of Tenancy Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

18 Aug 2006

The petitioner, a tenant, was inducted into a suit premises comprising a room (14' x 14') with two tin sheet walls and a tin shed (9' x 9') at a month...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorised Permanent Construction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Tenant's temporary structure argument rejected as Appellate Court found MS angles, asbestos sheets, and polythene roof constituted permanent construction causing danger to building.

21 Oct 2024

The case involves a dispute between the respondent-landlord, Kadambagiri Estates Pvt. Ltd., and the petitioner-tenant, Mrs. Binaifer Batiwala, over ev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction Against Demolition of Suit Structure in Municipal Corporation Dispute. Court Restrains Corporation from Demolishing Alleged Unauthorised Construction Pending Suit, Holding That Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favour Plaintiffs.

28 Feb 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (defendant no.1) and M/s. Chhaya Construction Company (defendant no...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Reconstruction of Servant Quarters in Cantonment Area. Reconstruction Without Prior Sanction Under Section 238 of Cantonments Act, 2006 Constitutes Unauthorized Construction Justifying Demolition Under Section 248(1).

17 Jul 2014

The petitioner, an occupant of residential premises within the Pune Cantonment Board limits, obtained sanction for building plans on 6 May 2008 under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Sale Deed Interpretation and Possessory Title. Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove possession of the first floor at the time of sale and that the suit for possession based on title alone without prior possession is not maintainable under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

7 Jun 2016

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant (Shriram Thakur, since deceased, through his legal representatives) against the judg...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)