Search Results for "timeline directory"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Non-Compliance of DRP Directions Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 144C(13) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Complete Assessment Within One Month of Receiving DRP Directions Renders Transfer Pricing Addition Time-Barred and Non-Est.

The Petitioner, Archroma International (India) Private Limited (formerly Huntsman International (India) Private Limited), filed a Writ Petition under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision by Juvenile in Heinous POCSO Case — Trial as Adult Upheld. Mental Capacity and Circumstances of Offence Justify Transfer Under Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Despite Procedural Delays.

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by Mustafa Kha: Jabbar Kha (CCL No.1) challenging the order of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Repeated Delays in Filing Written Statement. Unamended Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is Directory but Gross Negligence Justifies Striking Off Defence.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Desh Raj against the order of the Delhi High Court which upheld the Civil Court's decision to close hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...