Search Results for "terrorist funding"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence for Terror Funding. Payment of Extortion Money Under Duress for Business Operations Does Not Constitute Terror Funding Under Section 17 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal concerning bail denial to an accused charged with multiple offences, including under the Unlawful Activities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by Calcutta High Court in Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case — CBI Investigation Undermined by Premature Release. Reverse Burden of Proof Under Section 436A CrPC Not Applicable Where Investigation Ongoing and Trial Not Commenced.

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the grant of bail to multiple accused persons in connection with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Bail Cancellation in Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Case. High Court's Interference Deemed Appropriate as Appellants Admitted to Paying Money to Organization and Their Signatures Appeared on Receipts Submitted with Supplementary Charge-Sheet.

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals challenging the Gauhati High Court's orders cancelling bail granted to appellants under the Unlawful...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Hawala Operator in 2011 Mumbai Bomb Blasts Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Funding Sufficient to Frame Charges Under MCOC Act and UAPA.

The appellant, Mr. Kawalnayan Wazirchand Pathreja, was accused no.3 in MCOC Special Case No.12 of 2011 arising from the 13 July 2011 Mumbai bomb blast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses NIA Appeal Against Default Bail in UAP Act Case. High Court's Finding of Insufficient Reasons for Extension of Detention Under Section 43D(2)(b) of UAP Act Upheld in Changed Circumstances.

The case involves an appeal by the State through the Superintendent of Police, National Investigation Agency (NIA), Kochi, against the judgment of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Default Bail Case Under UAPA — Extension of Custody Upheld Despite Procedural Defects. Report of Public Prosecutor Must Indicate Application of Mind, But Technical Non-Compliance Not Fatal When Substance Exists.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra against the Bombay High Court's order granting default bail to the respondents/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...