Search Results for "telecommunication tower"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "telecommunication tower"

24 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Resolution for Non-Compliance with Bye-Laws and Natural Justice. Members' Rights to Challenge Resolution Upheld but Petition Fails on Merits Due to Failure to Exhaust Internal Remedies and Lack of Evidence of Violation of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

5 Dec 2025

The petitioners, Nitin Kantilal Gandhi and Apurva Ashwin Desai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

High Court Quashes Panchayat Notice Against Telecom Tower Operator for Lack of Authority Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Panchayat Cannot Interfere with Licensed Telecom Infrastructure Sharing as It Falls Under Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and DoT Guidelines.

3 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Tower Vision India Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act and licensed by the Ministry of Communications, Depar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Tax on Mobile Towers Following Supreme Court Precedent. Mobile Towers Held Taxable as 'Land' Under Municipal Corporation Acts Despite Absence of Specific Definition.

12 Apr 2019

The petitioner, GTL Infrastructure Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the exigibility of mobile towers to munic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.

23 Jan 2019

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Telecom Tower Installation in Residential Area Under Section 419 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Municipal Corporation Cannot Refuse Permission Based on Unauthorized Policy Restricting Towers in Residential Zones. Held that the power to grant permission under Section 419 is quasi-judicial and must be exercised reasonably, and a blanket ban on telecom towers in residential areas is ultra vires the Act.

26 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Bharti Airtel Limited, a telecom service provider, sought permission from the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to install a teleco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints Against Bharti Airtel for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Public Servant Protection Extended to Employees of Municipal Corporation Acting in Discharge of Official Duty. Employees of Municipal Corporation are public servants under Section 21 IPC, and acts of removing unauthorized telephone cables are in discharge of official duty, requiring sanction under Section 197 CrPC before prosecution.

22 Sep 2015

The applicant, Bharti Airtel Limited, filed three criminal applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Telecommunication Company Against Injunction Restraining Tower Construction. Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Based on Balance of Convenience and Prima Facie Case of Nuisance to Residents.

21 Aug 2006

The appellant, Reliance Infocom Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, engaged in telecommunications, filed a suit for per...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cellular Company's Petition Against Panchayat Orders for Demolition of Telecom Tower. Held that a mobile phone tower is not a 'building' under Section 135 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, and the Panchayat lacked jurisdiction to require prior permission or order removal.

5 May 2005

The petitioner, Bharti Cellular Ltd., a cellular service provider, installed a mobile phone tower on the terrace of a building in Navelim, Goa. The Vi...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)