Search Results for "take notice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "take notice"

16509 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16509 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Section 80 CPC Notice Validity Dispute, Reversing High Court's Finding of Invalidity. Proprietor Who Sent Notice Under Trade Name and Filed Suit Personally Held Compliant as Notice Read as Whole Revealed Proprietor's Identity and Object of Section Fulfilled.

26 Jul 1968

The appeal arose from a suit for compensation for lost goods filed by a sole proprietor against the railways. The appellant, carrying on business unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Contempt Petition Filed Against Municipal Officials for Alleged Violation of Court Order; Court Examines Procedural Requirement of Notice. The Court Analysed the Bombay High Court Rules Regarding Contempt Proceedings and Held That the Initial Notice under Rule 8 is Sufficient for Proceeding with the Contempt Petition.

4 Aug 2006

The contempt petition arose from a property dispute between a charitable trust, Saurashtra Vanza Gnyati Yuvak Mandal, and the Municipal Corporation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

20 Jan 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018

27 Feb 2019

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal in Unauthorized Construction Case Due to Lack of Proof of Authorization. Suit Challenging Demolition Order Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Found Maintainable Without Prior Notice Under Section 527 as It Seeks Injunctive Relief, Not Compensation.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a long-standing conflict between a property occupant and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai regarding the authori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Endorsement on RT-12 Return Constitutes Notice of Demand Under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The Court examines the rejection of a declaration under the KVS Scheme on the ground of absence of a show cause notice, where the RT-12 return contained a specific demand endorsement.

29 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a manufacturer of processed fabrics, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of its declaration u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insolvency Notice Based on Foreign Judgment — Notice Held Without Jurisdiction as Debt Not Payable Under Indian Insolvency Act. Foreign judgment debt not enforceable under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 without satisfying conditions of Section 13 CPC.

17 Dec 2012

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the Judgment Debtor, Neville Tuli, seeking to set aside an Insolvency Notice No. N/28 of 2011 issued by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Unsigned Notice Invalid and Proceedings Barred by Limitation. The court held that an unsigned notice under Section 148 is not a valid notice and cannot initiate reassessment proceedings beyond the limitation period under Section 149(1)(b).

9 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Prakash Krishnavtar Bhardwaj, a non-resident Indian residing in Dubai, UAE, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Government Contract Dispute — Substantial Compliance with Section 80 CPC Sufficient. Notice under Section 80 CPC need not be pedantically scrutinized; substantial compliance with cause of action and relief indicated is adequate.

30 Apr 2019

The present appeals relate to whether a notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been given to the State of Tamil Nadu in term...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Grama Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the notice period is mandatory, not directory, and quashed the notice that provided only 7 days instead of the required 15 days.

11 Sep 2019

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging notices for no-confidence mot...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)