Search Results for "tainted order"

856 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 856 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030001822015_1

The appeal arose from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, where the appellant, a Commercial Tax Officer, was convicted by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction in Bribery Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Revenue Inspector and Middleman Challenged Trial Court's Conviction for Demanding and Accepting Bribe for Change of Khata, Alleging Invalid Sanction and Procedural Errors.

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment of conviction and sentence by the Special Court in Spl. Case No.679/2011 dated 13.06.2013, convicting the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Appeal Against Conviction of Village Accountant Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Based on Alleged Demand and Acceptance of Bribe for Issuing Death Certificate Challenged for Lack of Proof of Demand.

Background: The matter pertained to a criminal appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the High Court of Karn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal by Accused Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Challenge Hinges on Proof of Demand and Credibility of Complainant.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Special Court under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (Appellant No.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony insufficient to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (accused no.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (accused no.2), who were convicted by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manikrao Salunke, was a Naib Tahsildar in Omerga, Osmanabad district. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences un...