Search Results for "sweet shop"

35 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision That Ice Cream Is Not 'Sweet and Sweetmeats' Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Ice cream is a distinct commodity not covered by Notification Entry 374 for reduced tax rate under Schedule Entry C-II-35(1).

The case concerns M/s. Vadilal Dairy International Ltd., a registered dealer and manufacturer of ice cream under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yadav Rajbahadur Ghyansingh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mehsana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 308 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ayubkhan Khodadad Khan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for an offence punishable under Section 308 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Prosecution Case. Alleged Stabbing Incident Lacks Credible Witnesses and Medical Evidence, Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 307 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 07.09.1995 passed by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition for Eviction on Ground of Reasonable and Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Landlord's Own Witness Admitted No Need for Possession, Defeating Claim Under Rent Control Law.

The petitioners, landlords of commercial premises in Kolhapur, filed a suit for eviction against the tenant on grounds of non-user, erection of perman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Last Seen Evidence and Recovery of Articles Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 364, 302, 201, 386 IPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, convicting the appellants for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Medical Evidence and Victim's Testimony Sufficient. Conviction Under Section 376 IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 of POCSO Act Confirmed as Prosecution Proved Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sandip s/o Atmaram Khandekar, was convicted by the Special Court at Warora for the offence of rape under Section 376 of the Indian Pena...