Search Results for "suo motu disallowance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "suo motu disallowance"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Cases on Disallowance of Interest Expenditure on Tax-Free Securities. Held that Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 mandates disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in total income, and the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction before invoking Rule 8D.

16 Apr 2019

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging orders of the Income Tax App...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows SIDCO's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallowance of Expenses Set Aside Due to Government Rejection of Reimbursement. Expenses incurred in earlier year but debited in later year after government's refusal to reimburse held allowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

29 Jan 2026

The appellant, Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation (SIDCO), a government company, was assigned the maintenance of six government prope...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Employees' Union and Individual Claimant in Company Liquidation Dispute — Upholds Official Liquidator's Decision to Reject Claims as Time-Barred Under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that workmen's dues, though entitled to priority, must be claimed within the limitation period prescribed under Rule 148 of the Company Court Rules, 1959.

8 Aug 2019

The case involves two appeals filed by the Kamani Employees' Union and Mrs. Triveni A. Kulkarni against the Official Liquidator and others. The disput...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Re-Assessment Orders in KVAT Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Input Tax Credit Denial Based on Non-Availability of Selling Dealers at Registered Address Held Invalid Under Section 10(2) and Section 39 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

17 Jun 2019

The petitioner, M/s Onyx Designs, a proprietorship concern dealing in bags and gift items, was a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Revisional Jurisdiction and Denies Exemption for Brass Sheets Not Specified in Eligibility Certificate under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that revisional power under Section 57 can be exercised despite pending appeals, and exemption benefits require strict compliance with the eligibility certificate's specified goods.

26 Feb 2015

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between M/s. Jitendra R. Gandhi (the assessee...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)