Search Results for "suo motu bail"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "suo motu bail"

61 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Despite Subsequent Filing of Chargesheet. Indefeasible Right Accrues on Expiry of Statutory Period and Filing of Bail Application Before Chargesheet.

13 Mar 2020

The appellant, M. Ravindran, was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.08.2018 for offences under the NDPS Act. Under Section 36A(4) of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Holding That Bail in Original FIR Does Not Cover Newly Added UAPA Offences and NIA Re-Registration Is Not a Second FIR. The court ruled that the appellant must seek fresh bail for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and that the NIA's re-registration and further investigation were lawful.

26 Apr 2019

The appellant, Pradeep Ram, was initially arrested in connection with FIR No. 02/2016 registered at Police Station Tandwa for offences under Sections ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Bail in Gambling Case — Applicants Not Named in FIR, Bail Granted Suo Motu by Magistrate Could Not Be Cancelled Without Proper Grounds. The Court held that cancellation of bail requires strong reasons such as tampering with evidence or fleeing from justice, and mere addition of Section 420 IPC without substantive evidence does not constitute sufficient ground.

26 Sep 2012

The applicants, Uttamkumar and Madhukar Wagh, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

23 Dec 2015

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Despite COVID-19 Pandemic — Order Dated 23.03.2020 Does Not Extend Period for Filing Charge Sheet. The right to default bail is indefeasible and cannot be frustrated by the prosecution's failure to file charge sheet within the statutory period.

16 Jun 2020

The appellant, S. Kasi, was arrested on 21.02.2020 in Crime No.495 of 2015 under Sections 457, 380, 457(2), 380(2), 411(2), and 414(2) IPC. He was lod...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

27 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

High Court

Court Considers Bail for Inmate after 7.5 Years of Incarceration. Supreme Court orders re-evaluation of prolonged detention under MPID Act; High Court deliberates on legal arguments and case history for final decision.

18 Jul 2024

The petitioner has been in jail for over seven and a half years for offenses under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Maharashtra Protection of Inter...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in National Investigation Agency Act Case Upholding State Court Jurisdiction Until NIA Takeover. The Court held that under Section 6(7) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, the State Police may continue investigation until the NIA actually takes over, and state courts retain jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for scheduled offences until that point.

20 Oct 2021

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 5 July 2018, which dismissed a criminal writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Guidelines for Detention of Overstaying Foreign Nationals in Suo Motu Writ Petition. Court directs State of Goa to establish detention centres and formulate standard operating procedures for handling foreign nationals who overstay their visas.

27 Feb 2019

The Bombay High Court at Goa took suo motu cognizance of the issue of overstaying foreign nationals in the State of Goa, arising from a criminal writ ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)