Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes Corrigendum to SDO Order Under Section 133 CrPC — Substitution of 'or' by 'and' Held Illegal as It Removes Conditional Nature of Order. The Corrigendum effectively made the conditional order absolute without giving the transporters an opportunity of hearing, violating the scheme of Section 133 CrPC.
10 Feb 2010The petitioners, mine transporters, challenged a Corrigendum issued by the Sub Divisional Officer (SDO) of Bicholim on 03.02.2010, which substituted t...
