Search Results for "substantial identity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "substantial identity"

599 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

8 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

1 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

1 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order — Plaint Rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as Suit Barred by Limitation and Section 170 of Representation of the People Act, 1951. The court held that the suit seeking declaration of public documents as fraudulently obtained was barred by limitation and by Section 170 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and thus the plaint was liable to be rejected.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioners, original defendants, challenged an order of the District Judge-2 Panaji at Ponda dated 17.10.2023, which allowed an appeal by the res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute — Rejects Bias Challenge Based on Non-Disclosure. Failure to disclose by arbitrator does not automatically render award contrary to public policy under Section 48(2)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; respondents waived objection by participating in arbitration without raising issue.

25 Apr 2023

The petitioner, HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Limited, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award against the respondents, Avitel Post Studioz Limi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Share Capital/Premium Case — Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investors Under Section 68 of Income Tax Act. The onus under Section 68 is on the assessee to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions; mere production of documents is insufficient when investor companies are non-existent or unresponsive.

1 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 for Unexplained Share Capital. Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investor Companies Despite Receiving Share Premium at Rs. 190 per Share.

1 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)