Search Results for "subsistence allowance recovery"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Disciplinary Order for Recovery of Rs. 2398.80 Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Disciplinary Rules

The petitioner, a junior engineer with  Respondent, challenged a disciplinary order dated 14/05/2019 imposing recovery of Rs. 2398.80 for alleged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Maintenance Rights for Divorced Muslim Women: Balancing Secular and Personal Laws. Court Affirms Applicability of Section 125 CrPC alongside the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, Ensuring Comprehensive Support for Divorced Muslim Women.

The appeal concerns the High Court of Telangana's modification of interim maintenance from INR 20,000 to INR 10,000 payable by the appellant to the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Scientist Without Inquiry in Interest of Security of State. Dismissal under Article 311(2)(c) of Constitution and Rule 14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 Upheld as Procedural Safeguards Not Applicable Where Security of State is Involved.

The appellant, Dr. V.R. Sanal Kumar, was a Scientist/Engineer in the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC), a unit of the Indian Space Research Organisa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms Interim Maintenance for Wife and Son in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Frames Guidelines on Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and Other Enactments to Ensure Uniformity and Consistency.

The case arises from an application for interim maintenance filed by the wife and minor son under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The wife left the matrimonial ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Employee Convicted of Theft While Under Suspension — Limitation Bar Applied for Delayed Challenge. The Court held that a removal order under Rule 19(i) of CCS (CCA) Rules is not a continuing wrong and delay of 13 years cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Approve Dismissal in Gold Smuggling Case. Tribunal's Finding of Unfair Enquiry and Perverse Findings Upheld Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Air India Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22nd July 2004 passed ...