Search Results for "spoiled stamps"

Trending :

Search Results for "spoiled stamps"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act — Purpose of Instrument Failed. Development Agreement is an instrument covered under Section 47(c)(5) for refund when the purpose fails, and Section 48 is only a limitation provision.

16 Aug 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Chandiwala Enterprises, a registered partnership firm, entered into a Development Agreement with Neel Ashiward CHS Ltd. on 2nd Se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Un-Executed Conveyance Deed Due to Vendor Fraud. Limitation Period for Application Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Runs from Date of Instrument, Not from Date of Cancellation Deed.

17 May 2024

The appellant, a bona fide purchaser, agreed to buy property from Mohammed Hanif Ahmed Fitwala and prepared a conveyance deed. On 7 May 2014, the deed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 When Agreement to Purchase is Cancelled Due to Developer's Default. The court held that since no conveyance deed was executed and the agreement was cancelled due to developer's default, the petitioner is entitled to refund of stamp duty under Section 48 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

11 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Satish Buba Shetty, a retired bank official, entered into an Agreement to Purchase a flat with M/s. Vijaykamal Properties Private Limi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 — Petitioner Entitled to Refund Despite Delay in Application. The court held that the limitation period under Section 49 should be liberally construed to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the petitioner's delay in applying for refund was condonable as the transactions never materialized.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment on Writ Petition Against Refusal of Stamp Duty Refund Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Limitation Dispute Under Section 48(3) Due to Correction of Applicant's Name Beyond Six Months.

9 Jan 2023

The writ petition was filed by Freedom City Ventures, a partnership firm, seeking to quash the order dated 21st June 2014 passed by the Inspector Gene...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty in Consumer Dispute, Overturns High Court's Limitation Bar. Stamp Duty Refund Application Not Barred by Six-Month Limitation Under Section 48(3) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 When Stamp Paper Purchased Bona Fide and Transaction Failed Due to Judicial Order from National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

24 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from the appellant's booking of a residential apartment in Pune in 2014, where he paid stamp duty for an agreement to sell. A d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Unexecuted Lease Agreement — No Liability Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Adjudication under Section 31 cannot be basis for demand when document is not executed and no stamp duty is chargeable.

8 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Crisil Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, had been in occupation of office premises at Hiranandani Business Park, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Advocate's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Court Fee Stamps. Section 52B of Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Held Inapplicable to Court Fee Stamps Under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

9 Jan 2006

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a civil suit for possession valued at Rs. 40,500 and paid court fee of Rs. 4,530 using stamps. The court ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)