Search Results for "sole proprietorship"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award and District Court Order in Partnership Dispute. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to reappreciation under Section 34 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

The appellants, M. Mallikarjuna and Smt. Rajeshwari Mallikarjuna, filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Forfeiture of Tenancy under Section 111(g) TPA Not Attracted When Tenant Claims Firm Tenancy Without Denying Landlord’s Title – Bombay High Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Second Appeal No. 81 of 2013 (2026)

The plaintiff filed a suit for possession, arrears of rent, and damages claiming that Late Mohd. Siddique was his tenant since 1960. Lat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Enhances Compensation for Death of 55-Year-Old Man in Motor Accident, Upholds Negligence of Driver and Vicarious Liability of Owner. Future Prospects at 10% and Multiplier of 11 Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, R. Rajendran, who died in a road accident on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Legal Heirs of Deceased. Negligence of Driver Established by Criminal Conviction and Tribunal's Evidence Appreciation.

The case arises from a fatal motor accident that occurred on December 3, 2006, when the deceased, Janarthanan, was riding a motorcycle and was hit by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Proprietorship Firm and IIT Dharwad. Arbitration clause invoked under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for disputes arising from contract dated 10.04.2018.

The petitioner, M/S. Suresh Goel & Associates, a proprietorship concern, filed a petition under Section 11(5)(6) and 12(b) of the Arbitration and Conc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court restored conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of two cheques of Rs.1 lakh each.

The appellant, M/s Radhesham Laxminarayan and Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complaint by Constituted Attorney in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Reinstates Process Quashed by Sessions Court. Constituted Attorney Can File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on Behalf of Payee.

The petitioner, Vilas Baliram Sawant, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, which quashed the ...