Search Results for "silver utensils"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Flawed Circumstantial Evidence. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity and Circumstantial Evidence Was Unreliable Under Section 397 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Nagaraja (Accused No.4) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had reversed his acquittal and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal, Upholds Restitution of Conjugal Rights in Favor of Wife Under Special Marriage Act. Husband's Counterclaim for Divorce Based on Alleged False Criminal Complaint Rejected as Not Constituting Cruelty.

The case involves an appeal by the husband against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Jalgaon, dated 22.04.2016, in Special Marriage Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Hard-Anodised Utensils Under Residual Entry in Sales Tax Reference. Hard-Anodised Utensils Held Not Classifiable as Aluminium Utensils Under Entry C-II-17 of Schedule E of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, But Under Residual Entry C-II-46A.

The case involves two Sales Tax References under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of Meera Metal Industries (the applican...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused in Dacoity with Murder Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Dacoity Under Section 396 IPC. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Property Under Section 412 IPC.

The case involves four criminal appeals filed under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code against a common judgment and order of conviction and s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder and Robbery of a Neuro Surgeon in His Residence — Life Imprisonment Maintained Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory.

The appellants, Kailash Upendra Giri and Damodar Laxmidhar Sahu, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Return of Stridhan Under Section 27 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Husband Liable for Ornaments and Articles. The court held that the husband is presumed to be in possession of the wife's stridhan and must return it unless he proves otherwise.

The appellant wife, Sangeeta B. Kadam, filed a Family Court Appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 11th June 2001 passed by the Family Court ...