Search Results for "side pocket"

236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in CBI Trap Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused Public Servant's Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Restored as Trial Court's Acquittal Based on Minor Contradictions Was Perverse.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Shriram Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Corruption Case for Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Appellant convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs. 500 as illegal gratification for processing a grant application.

The appellant, Manoj Shankar Deshpande, a public servant working as an Assistant in the Fisheries Department, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Balwant Malvankar, was a clerk/beat inspector with the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. He was convicted by the Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Clerk for Bribery in Pension Case, Acquits Head Clerk Due to Lack of Demand Proof. Accused No.2 convicted under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs.2000 bribe for processing pension proposal.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Special Judge (Anti-Corruption), Pune, in Special Case No.53 of 2015. The State of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, M.C. Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Special Case No. 69/2004 for offences puni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Purushottam Raghunath Kulkarni, was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Pandit Shankar Chaudhari and Subhash Kitk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Doubtful Trap — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 not proved; complainant turned hostile; trap witness not independent.

The appellant, Manohar Bodade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case No. 01/1993 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r...