Search Results for "setting aside ex-parte decree"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Ex-parte Decree Set Aside Due to Improper Service of Summons. First Appellate Court's Order Restored as Trial Court Failed to Comply with Order V Rule 17 CPC.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.126/2007) alleging that the respondent/defendant executed an agreeme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit – High Court’s Order Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree Without Proper Jurisdiction Held Unsustainable

Revisional Jurisdiction – Delay Condonation – Restoration of Suit – Independent Legal Remedies The Court held that the remedies of condoning th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Objection to Execution of Decree Based on Jurisdictional Challenge Under Section 39(4) CPC. Court Holds That Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Execution by the Court That Passed the Decree When the Property Is Situated Outside Its Local Limits.

The present chamber summons arose out of a suit filed by ICICI Ltd, as Debenture Trustees, against Kothri Industrial Corporation Ltd and others for re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Bank's Petition Against Setting Aside of Ex Parte Award Against Principal Borrower. Principal Borrower Cannot Participate in Proceedings Without Depositing Loan Amount.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited against Vijaya Paints Pvt. Ltd. and others. The bank had obtained an ex p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Lack of Proper Service of Summons. Delay of 164 Days Condoned as Defendant Demonstrated Good Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order XXXVII of CPC, 1908.

The plaintiff, Fountainhead Promotions & Events Pvt Ltd, filed a Summary Suit No. 874 of 2010 against the defendant, Gitanjali Lifestyle Limited, clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Insolvency Notice Based on Foreign Judgment — Notice Held Without Jurisdiction as Debt Not Payable Under Indian Insolvency Act. Foreign judgment debt not enforceable under Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 without satisfying conditions of Section 13 CPC.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the Judgment Debtor, Neville Tuli, seeking to set aside an Insolvency Notice No. N/28 of 2011 issued by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Dismisses Wife's Appeal Against Ex-Parte Divorce Decree. Appeal Rendered Infructuous Due to Husband's Lawful Remarriage Following Divorce Decree

A second appeal filed by the appellant/wife against the decision of the learned District Judge-10, Aurangabad, who refused to condone a 166-day delay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Money Suit — Service of Summons Valid Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. The court held that the defendant had knowledge of the suit and failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance, upholding the ex parte decree.

The appellant, M/s. CliniRX Research Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant in a money suit filed by the respondent, Bicare Limited, for recovery of mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Specific Performance Suit — Ex-parte Decree Restored Due to Valid Service of Summons. Service by affixture at last known address under Order 5 Rule 20 CPC held valid despite bailiff's report of 'left premises'.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance against the respondent/defendant based on an agreement dated 4th April 199...