Search Results for "setting aside consent terms"

3378 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3378 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consent Decree Execution Dispute — Family Settlement Must Be Enforced to Give Fruits of Decree. Court Holds That Executing Court Cannot Nullify Consent Terms by Reading Implied Conditions; Direction Issued to Execute Letter of Allotment.

The dispute arose between two groups of family members, the PA Group (appellants) and the RA Group (respondents), over the assets of Kash Foods Privat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Terms in Eviction Suit Due to Breach of Undertaking and Delay. Applicants who gave a solemn undertaking to vacate premises by 31st December 2016 and violated it cannot be permitted to resile from consent terms after 12 years.

The case arises from a long-standing eviction dispute. The respondent-plaintiff (licensor) instituted S.C. Suit No. 869 of 1975 against the applicants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Disputed Consent Terms. Consent Decree Set Aside as Court Failed to Verify Genuineness of Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 28 September 2012, which made absolute a motion for recordi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Award in Arbitration — Consent Terms Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn After Being Acted Upon. Arbitrator Not Required to Deliver Signed Award Under Section 31(5) When Award Is Made in Terms of Consent Terms Under Section 30.

The appellant, M/s. Pandi Devi Oil Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arb...