Search Results for "separate undertaking"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "separate undertaking"

904 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 904 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act — Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld. The court held that the Industrial Court correctly declared the first respondent-union as the recognized union, as it had higher membership and the verification was properly conducted.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

20 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 80-IB for Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts. Court Held That Duty Drawback and DEPB Receipts Are Profits Derived From Business Under Section 80-IB of Income Tax Act, 1961, as They Reimburse Manufacturing and Exporting Costs, Following Meghalaya Steels Limited and Topman Exports Precedents.

10 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by an assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting wooden handicraft items, against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case - STP Undertaking Exemption Denied as Manufacturing Commenced Before 1 April 1994. The court held that the conditions of Section 10A(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were not fulfilled because the undertaking had already started manufacturing before the cutoff date, and the subsequent slump sale did not affect the commencement date.

6 Mar 2012

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing the assessee...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal in Sesa Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Income-tax: Profit from Sale of Slag, a By-product in Pig Iron Manufacture, is Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80-IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

18 Apr 2019

The appellant, Sesa Industries Limited, an assessee under the Income-tax Act, 1961, filed a tax appeal under Section 260-A against the order of the In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Slump Sale Case. Transfer of IMFL Business as Going Concern Not Subject to Capital Gains Tax Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

8 Feb 2012

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Application Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC for Alleged Violation of Injunction Order. Court holds that mere filing of a suit for permanent injunction does not automatically establish willful disobedience of an interim order without proof of specific notice and deliberate defiance.

23 Feb 2021

The appellants, who were plaintiffs in a suit for permanent injunction, filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC alleging that the responden...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)