Search Results for "seeds expiry"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Managing Director in Seeds Act Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint under Section 6(a) read with Section 19(a) of Seeds Act, 1966 fails to disclose role of petitioner as Managing Director.

The petitioner, Rafel Del Riyo, Managing Director of Syngenta India Limited, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Seeds Act Proceedings for Lack of Sanction — Seeds Inspector Not Authorized to File Complaint Without Prior Sanction Under Section 21 of Seeds Act, 1966

The petitioner, Mohan H. Handral, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking to quash the proceeding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Seeds Act Proceedings for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 14(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 Renders Complaint Invalid.

The petitioner, Mohan H. Handral, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking to quash the proceeding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 14(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The applicants, Ajeet Seeds Ltd., M/s Bhushan Agro Agencies, and M/s Bharatkumar Purushottam Potdar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Seed Company Officials in Seeds Act Violation Case. Court holds that vicarious liability cannot be imposed on officers without specific averments of their role in the alleged offence under Section 6(b) read with Section 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966.

The petitioners, M/s Mahyco Vegetable Seeds Ltd. (a seed producer), its Deputy Manager (Legal) M.M. Chavan, and Senior Manager (SDM) Anil Kolte, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Seeds Act Case Due to Loss of Right to Re-test Sample. Applicant's Right Under Section 16(2) of Seeds Act, 1966 to Send Sample to Central Seed Testing Laboratory Lost as Shelf Life of Seed Expired Before Complaint Filed.

The applicant, Regional Manager of Prabhat Agri Bio-Tech Ltd., challenged criminal proceedings in S.C.C. No. 313 of 2003 pending before the Chief Judi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Seeds Act Case for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Give Notice Under Rule 7(1) of Seeds Rules, 1968 Before Drawing Sample Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The petitioners, Vishwas Pandhari Khuje, Rajendra Bhikanrao Deshmukh, and Ramdas Dnyandev Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...