Search Results for "section 44"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Bus Conductor Challenging Dismissal for Misappropriation. Industrial Court's Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 Upheld as Labour Court's Reinstatement Order Was Perverse.

The petitioner, Khanderao Punjabrao Mundhe, was employed as a bus conductor with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) in 1979. On ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employees' Writ Petitions Against Industrial Court's Refusal to Register Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act. Industrial Court Cannot Reject Revision at Threshold on Ground of Interlocutory Order.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by employees challenging the refusal of the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar, to register their Revision (U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission for Construction Allegedly Encroaching on Public Right of Way. Court finds no violation of licence conditions and holds that petitioners failed to establish any public right of way over the property.

The petitioners, a village group and its president, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging development permiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Ex Parte Award Under MRTU & PULP Act. Revisional Court Can Reappreciate Evidence When Award Is Ex Parte and Sufficient Material Is Placed.

The petitioner, Harsha Nitin Vora, challenged an order dated 6th October 2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which set aside an ex parte orde...