Revocation of Probate Not Maintainable on Grounds of Title Dispute. Bombay High Court
17 Mar 2026The Bombay High Court held that a probate cannot be revoked on the ground that the testator lacked title to the bequeathed property. S...
Search Results for "section 351"
411 result(s) found
Found 411 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Settlement Reached Between Applicant and Informant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 126(2), 351(1), 351(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
18 Dec 2025The applicant filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 51 of 2025 registered...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Fixed-Term Security Guard in Saudi Arabian Airlines Case. Fixed-term employment found to be a camouflage to deny permanency benefits under MRTU & PULP Act.
1 Nov 2018The appellant, Saudi Arabian Airlines, engaged the respondent workman as a Security Guard on a fixed-term contract from 1st October 1989 for two years...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Restaurant Construction Without Sanctioned Plan. Court Holds That Construction of a Temporary Structure for Restaurant Business Does Not Require Prior Approval Under Section 347 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and That the Corporation Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice Before Demolition.
28 Sep 2018The appellants, M/s Rasraj Restaurant (a partnership firm) and its partners, filed an appeal against the order of the trial court refusing to grant an...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses ICICI Bank's Intervention Application in Winding-Up Petition. ICICI Bank's claim not yet due and it is otherwise sufficiently secured; application held premature and aimed at defeating resolution of BNYM's claim.
5 Mar 2014The applicant, ICICI Bank Limited, sought to be impleaded as a respondent or alternatively to intervene in a company application filed by The Bank of ...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 515A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Barring Civil Suits Against Demolition Orders. Provision held constitutionally valid as it does not oust writ jurisdiction and provides adequate alternative remedy.
17 Jul 2013The petitioner, Abdul Razzaq Sunesra, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 515A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, inserted b...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act. Settlement Agreement Creates Fresh Liability, Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted.
7 Sep 2006The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, M/s. Cabral & Co. and its proprietor Francis Simon Cabral, against their convi...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.
16 Sep 2005The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...
- 79
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Head Constables in Promotion Dispute — Rules 2010 Notified After Vacancy Cannot Deny Promotion. Educational Qualification for Promotion to ASI-Executive Must Be Possessed at Time of Promotion, Not Initial Appointment, Under 2008 Rules and Standing Order.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a dispute among Head Constables of the Andaman & Nicobar Police Department regarding promotion to the post of Assistant Sub-Inspecto...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeals in Encroachment Dispute, Holding Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction. Shopkeepers' Suits for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Property Vested in Corporation Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.
30 Nov -0001The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its Assistant Municipal Commissioner filed appeals against an interim order passed by the City Civil C...
- 92
