Search Results for "section 31"

7 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Execution Proceedings Under Employees Compensation Act — Section 31 of the Act Provides Exclusive Mode of Recovery, Not Barring Application of CPC Order 21 for Execution of Award.

The petitioner, an insurance company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the execution proceedi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Stamp Duty Adjudication Case — Holds Adjudication Under Section 31 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 Final and Binding. Reopening of Adjudication After 20 Years Under Section 53A Is Without Jurisdiction and Barred by Delay.

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Unexecuted Lease Agreement — No Liability Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Adjudication under Section 31 cannot be basis for demand when document is not executed and no stamp duty is chargeable.

The petitioner, Crisil Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, had been in occupation of office premises at Hiranandani Business Park, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Modification of Development Plan Under MRTP Act for Non-Compliance with Section 31(3) and Section 37. The court held that modification of land reservation from educational to residential is substantial and requires notice and hearing.

The petitioner, Modern Education Society, Vita, a registered public trust engaged in educational activities, challenged a part of the notification dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Part, Upholds Revenue Treatment of Transformer Repairs. Expenditure on repairs of damaged transformer held to be current repairs under Section 31 of Income Tax Act, 1961, not capital expenditure.

The case involves three Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nagpur, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Corrigendum to Final Development Plan. Corrigendum Restoring Botanical Garden Reservation Upheld as Permissible Rectification of Error Without Fresh Notification Under MRTP Act.

The petitioner, Housilal Balchand Shah, owned land in survey no. 34 at Anand Valli, Nasik. In the draft development plan under the Maharashtra Regiona...