Search Results for "section 25 Evidence Act"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Parricide Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Improper Investigation. Conviction under Sections 304(II) and 201 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence and Confession Fail to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhika Mahadeo Agalate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of his father Mahadeo Agalate under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ku. Panchashila Uttam Thorat, was convicted by the II Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim in Sessions Trial No. 98/2004 for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extrajudicial Confession and Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his roommate, Mohmed Akhtar Gafur Ansari, on 6th September 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as extra-judicial confession to police officer is barred by Section 25 of Evidence Act and recovery of weapon does not establish guilt.

The appellant, Shashikant Shantaram Bhandari, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his aunt Vatsala under Section 302 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals by Accused Against Conviction for Murder of IOC Officer — Admissibility of Confessional Statements Under Section 25 of Evidence Act Challenged. Confessional Statements Made to Non-Investigating Police Officers Argued as Inadmissible Under Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

These appeals arose from the conviction of several accused for the murder of S. Manjunath, a Sales Officer with Indian Oil Corporation, who had inspec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case After 22 Years of Incarceration; High Court Erred in Dismissing Jail Appeal on Grounds of Delay. Conviction Based on Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony Set Aside Due to Discrepancies and Investigation Lapses.

The case involved a criminal appeal by a convict who had been sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Admissibility of Confessional Statements to Customs Officers Under Customs Act, 1962. Customs Officers Held Not Police Officers Under Section 25 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 as They Lack Power to Submit Charge Sheet Under Section 173 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

The appeal arose from criminal proceedings initiated by the Collector of Customs, Madras, against Illias and nine others for offences under Section 12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Accused in Smuggling Case; Customs Officers Held Not to Be Police Officers Under Section 25 Evidence Act. Confessional Statements to Customs Officers Admissible; No Violation of Article 20(3) as Accused Not Formally Accused During Inquiry Stage.

The Assistant Collector of Customs filed a complaint against Romesh Chandra Mehta and four others for conspiracy under section 120-B of the Indian Pen...