Search Results for "scooter accident"

105 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 105 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Parents Fail to Prove Negligence and Income of Deceased Son. Claim for Compensation Dismissed as Claimants Did Not Establish Rash and Negligent Driving or Deceased's Employment and Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, K. J. Mohammad and Smt. Saramma, parents of a deceased 22-year-old son, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's award of Rs.20,13,893 set aside; compensation recalculated at Rs.4,83,893 with 7.5% interest for death of 56-year-old private employee.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of deceased Mohansinh Narsinh Sapa, who died in a road accident on 26.05...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Appeal by AMTS Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Case Due to Claimant's Contributory Negligence. The court upheld the 80:20 apportionment of negligence but reduced the compensation from Rs. 5,74,480 to Rs. 4,59,584 with 8% interest.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 08.05.2006 when the claimant, Babarbhai Jethabhai Vankar, a professor aged 38, was riding an Ac...