Search Results for "scandalizing judge"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Contempt Proceedings Against Advocate for Scandalizing Family Court Judge in Maintenance Case. Advocate's Allegations of Bias and Prejudice in Written Application Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

This contempt petition arose from a reference made by Shri A.S. Shivankar, Judge of the Family Court No.2 at Mumbai, under Section 15(2) of the Contem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Initiates Suo Moto Contempt for Scandalous Allegations Against High Court Judge. Unconditional Apology Accepted, Contempt Proceedings Closed.

The Supreme Court initiated suo moto contempt proceedings against N. Peddi Raju (alleged contemnor no.1), Ritesh Patil (alleged contemnor no.2), and N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Contemner for Criminal Contempt for Scandalizing Judicial Officer in Maintenance Proceedings. Unfounded Allegations of Corruption and Bias Against Judicial Magistrate Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The Bombay High Court, in a suo motu criminal contempt petition, convicted Dnyandev Tulshiram Jadhav for criminal contempt for making unfounded and ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court on its Own Motion Proceeds Against Individual for Scandalous Facebook Posts Targeting Judges. Court Stresses That Such Vicious Attacks on Judiciary Constitute Gross Criminal Contempt Undermining Rule of Law.

Suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings were initiated by the Bombay High Court against an individual who, through his Facebook profile, published a se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Criminal Contempt Reference Against Accused for Threatening and Scandalizing Metropolitan Magistrate. Persistent Harassment, Intimidation, and Obstructing Judicial Proceedings Prima Facie Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The matter arose from a criminal contempt reference made by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 17th Court, Borivali, Mumbai, under Section 15(2) of the Cont...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Initiates Suo Motu Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against Advocate. Written Material Scandalised the Court, Lowering its Dignity and Interfering with Administration of Justice, Violating Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

This is a suo motu criminal contempt proceeding initiated by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against Mrs. Vineeta Srinandan. The court took cog...