Search Results for "sanction validity"

1031 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1031 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validity of Prosecution Sanctions: Pre-Trial Determination or Trial Issue? A comprehensive analysis of conflicting Apex Court judgments on the timing and significance of challenging prosecution sanctions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The legal debate on whether the validity of a prosecution sanction must be determined before trial or can be contested during the trial. It examines k...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanction — Prior Sanction Under Section 20A(2) TADA Must Show Application of Mind. The Designated Court's finding of non-application of mind in sanction order was upheld, and the prosecution could not proceed under TADA.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of three respondents by the Designated Judge, Jamnagar, in Special TADA Case Nos.3/1994, 3/1997, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Sanction in Corruption Case Against Motor Vehicles Inspector. Sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 held valid as sanctioning authority applied its mind to the material.

The petitioner, Dr. H. C. Sathyan, a Motor Vehicles Inspector working at the RTO Office, Sakleshpur, was charge-sheeted by the Karnataka Lokayukta Pol...