Search Results for "same roof"

558 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 558 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant for Unauthorised Permanent Construction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Tenant's temporary structure argument rejected as Appellate Court found MS angles, asbestos sheets, and polythene roof constituted permanent construction causing danger to building.

The case involves a dispute between the respondent-landlord, Kadambagiri Estates Pvt. Ltd., and the petitioner-tenant, Mrs. Binaifer Batiwala, over ev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Murder Case Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC Upheld as Concurrent Findings of Fact Are Not Disturbed.

The appeal arises from a conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Sanju. The incident occurred on 31 August 2002 when t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Family Partition Dispute Over Roof Rights and Valuation of Property. Court Holds That Reopening Final Decree Would Undo Settled Rights and Encourage Further Litigation.

The present appeal arises from a family partition dispute concerning the properties left by Late Rameshwar Nath Soral, who died on 28.01.1996, survive...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for permanent injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession; substantial questions of law not made out.

The appellant, Smt. Sathyamma, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 3.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an incident where the deceased was allegedly assaulted by a group of persons, resulting in his death. The appellants, along with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of the appellants (accused nos. 1 and 5 in some appeals, and accused no. 2 in another) by the Fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Reconstruction of Servant Quarters in Cantonment Area. Reconstruction Without Prior Sanction Under Section 238 of Cantonments Act, 2006 Constitutes Unauthorized Construction Justifying Demolition Under Section 248(1).

The petitioner, an occupant of residential premises within the Pune Cantonment Board limits, obtained sanction for building plans on 6 May 2008 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal for Full Deduction of Roof Repair Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure incurred by tenant on replacement of common roof held to be revenue expenditure allowable in entirety as commercial expediency.

The appellant, Danesh A. Irani, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (IT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Transport Operators Challenging Checkpost Fees Under Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Tax Act. Levy of Checkpost Fees Held Compensatory and Not Discriminatory Under Article 14.

The petitioners, seventeen transport operators having their principal place of business in Bangalore, Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Article 2...