Search Results for "sales tax deferral"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "sales tax deferral"

13 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Auction Purchaser in TNVAT Recovery Case — Priority of Crown Debt Over Mortgagee's Right. The court held that a bona fide auction purchaser who buys property through a mortgagee's sale under Section 69 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 takes the property free of all encumbrances, including subsequent tax demands under Section 24 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, D.K. Sadasivam, was the successful purchaser of a property (S.Nos. 7/10, 7/11 and 13/1 in Sigarahalli Village, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Sales Tax Exemption Dispute Under Karnataka Industrial Policy. Industrial Policy 1996-2001 Does Not Cover Purchase Tax Under Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.

5 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by M/s High Range Coffee Curing Pvt. Ltd. against the State of Karnataka and others, challenging the High Court's ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

24 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case — Notice Issued Beyond Four-Year Limit Without Allegation of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2009-10 Quashed as Assessing Officer Failed to Record Satisfaction That Income Escaped Due to Assessee's Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

23 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Dell India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture and sale of computer hardware and related products. For the Assessment Year 2009-1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Cases — Holds That Arm's Length Price Determination Must Be Based on Reliable Comparable Data and Functional Analysis. The Tribunal's deletion of adjustments was upheld as it correctly applied functional comparability and permissible adjustments under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 10B of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.

5 Dec 2014

The judgment involves a batch of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of the Income Tax...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeals and Petitions in Sales Tax Deferral Case — Remission of Liability Not Established Without Credit by Sales Tax Authorities. Payment of Present Value to SICOM Does Not Constitute Remission Under Section 41(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 When Sales Tax Authorities Have Not Given Credit.

10 Jun 2010

The assessee, M/s. SI Group India Ltd., had an industrial unit in Raigad district, a notified backward area. The Government of Maharashtra issued a pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sales Tax Incentive Scheme Withdrawal — No Promissory Estoppel Against Policy Change in Public Interest. The court held that the withdrawal of a general sales tax incentive scheme by the State Government was valid and not violative of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by industrial units (M/s. Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd., M/s. Chandrapur Vidyut Conductors Private Ltd....

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)