Search Results for "robbery with hurt"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "robbery with hurt"

58 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Non-Applicability of Section 397 IPC. The Court held that Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, applies only to the offender who uses a deadly weapon, and the benefit of acquittal of a co-accused extends to other accused when allegations are indivisible, leading to acquittal based on unreliable identification and suspicious FIR.

29 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by two appellants, Ganesan and Shanmugam, challenging their conviction under Section 397 of th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Preparation to Commit Robbery Case — No Evidence of Attempt to Commit Robbery or Use of Deadly Weapons. Conviction under Section 398 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused attempted to commit robbery while armed with deadly weapons.

28 Feb 2020

The appellant, accused No.2, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Mandya, for an offence punishable under Section 398 of the Indian Penal Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction in Robbery Case: Offence of Robbery Under Section 390 IPC Not Made Out as No Grievous Hurt Caused or Attempted. The court held that for theft to become robbery, the offender must cause or attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, and mere tying up does not suffice.

18 Oct 2011

The appellant, Dudhnath @ Ajay Baburam Harijan, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Sections 394, 450...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Robbery Case — Conviction Under Section 397 IPC Set Aside as Firearm Not Actually Used. Robbery Under Section 392 IPC Upheld Based on Credible Testimony and Recovery of Stolen Property.

28 Mar 2022

The appellant, Ram Ratan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the MPDVPK Act, 1981, Sheopur, for offences under Sections 392 and 397 of the India...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Dacoity and Impersonation in Fake Police Raid Case. Accused impersonated police officers and robbed complainant of cash and gold, convicted under Sections 170, 419, 395 read with Section 114 IPC.

17 Feb 2026

The case involves a fake police raid conducted by five accused persons who impersonated police officers and robbed the complainant of cash and gold. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 397, 307, 353 IPC set aside as sole reliance on police witnesses and delayed identification parade rendered prosecution case doubtful.

1 Nov 2012

The case involves two appeals filed by original accused No.1 (Sayeed Rashid Shaikh @ Saidu Bangali) and accused No.2 (Amit Ismail Patel @ Ammu Batan) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Conviction in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. The court held that the testimony of a single witness (PW8) without corroboration and unreliable identification cannot sustain a conviction under Section 395 IPC.

27 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, in Sessions Case No.1505/99. The appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery with Hurt Under Section 394 IPC — Housebreaking and Attempted Robbery with Use of Knife Constitute Robbery. Accused's conviction for voluntarily causing hurt during housebreaking and attempted robbery was confirmed as the evidence of eyewitnesses and medical report established the offence.

9 Jan 2006

The revision-petitioner, Sanjay alias Handi, challenged his conviction under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for robbery with hurt. The cas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery in Auto Rickshaw Snatching Case — Identification by Informant and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 394 IPC.

24 Apr 2017

The revision petitioner, Mansingh Dhonduram Sakpal, was convicted by the trial Magistrate for the offence punishable under Section 394 read with Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 307, 397 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

6 Feb 2012

The appellant, Anil Lilachand Sarjare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.132/2007 for offences under Sections 307 read ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)