Search Results for "retrospective cessation"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Employee Convicted of Theft While Under Suspension — Limitation Bar Applied for Delayed Challenge. The Court held that a removal order under Rule 19(i) of CCS (CCA) Rules is not a continuing wrong and delay of 13 years cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Rule 23 of LIC Pension Rules, 1995, and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Petition with Weekly Holidays Counted as Worked Days and Interest at 10%. Employee entitled to additional gratuity based on retrospective pay revision and interest for delayed payment under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

The petitioner, Baban S/o Rama Khakale, a retired employee of Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit Seeking Removal of Managing Director on Ground of Age Limit Under Companies Act, 2013. Section 196(3)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 Held Not Retrospective and Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Appointments.

The plaintiff, a director of Ultramarine & Pigments Limited, filed a suit seeking an order to restrain the 2nd defendant, the Chairman and Managing Di...