Search Results for "retrenched employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "retrenched employee"

177 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 177 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee as Nominee on Enquiry Committee Under MEPS Rules — Purposive Interpretation of Beneficial Legislation. The Court held that Rule 36(2)(b)(ii) of the MEPS Rules permits nomination of a retired/former employee to the Enquiry Committee, as the definition of 'employee' does not restrict to serving employees only.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Mangalsingh Amarsingh Rathod, was the Head Master of Mahatma Phule High School, Nimgaon, and was placed under suspension. A disciplina...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Modification of Reinstatement Award in Industrial Dispute - Employee's Status as Workman Confirmed. Compensation of Rs.75,000 in lieu of reinstatement and back wages held just and proper due to long lapse of time and acceptance of notice pay.

4 Oct 2024

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from an industrial dispute between Lenin Kumar Ray (employee) and M/s. Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Employer Seeking Exclusion of Retired Railway Employees from EPF Coverage. Retired Employees Who Withdrew Full GPF Accumulations Are Not 'Excluded Employees' Under Paragraph 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, as the Term 'Fund' Refers Only to the EPF Fund Established Under the Act.

26 Mar 2019

The case involves an appeal by Modern Transportation Consultation Services Pvt. Ltd. and its director against the judgment of the Division Bench of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against U.P. Jal Nigam in Workmen Reinstatement Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court Held That the Order Dated 07.09.2015 Only Required Giving Preference to Retrenched Workmen for Future Vacancies, Not Automatic Reinstatement.

4 Jan 2019

The present contempt petitions arose from an order dated 07.09.2015 passed by the Supreme Court disposing of a batch of Special Leave Petitions filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retrenched Worker Seeking Absorption as Permanent Employee in University — Land Acquisition for Research Centre Entitles Displaced Person to Preference in Employment Under Section 40 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeth) Act, 1960.

11 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Sumanbai Bhaurao Shinde, a retrenched worker of the respondent Marathwada Agricultural University, filed a writ petition seeking direc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Failed to Prove Termination Was Not Retaliatory. Oral Termination Without Notice or Justification Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Items (a), (b), (d), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

7 Aug 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Val Colour Arts and its proprietor Mr. Valentine D'mello (employer), challenged the judgments of the First Labour Court, Mumbai, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order Converting Dismissal into Retrenchment for Workman Found Guilty of Misconduct. Punishment of Dismissal Held Disproportionate to Misconduct of Theft of Company Property; Workman Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation and Notice Pay.

18 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court, Satara, dated 24th April 1996, in Complaint (ULP) No.17 of 1988, an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice for Non-Observance of Rule 81 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 and Section 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Custom and Practice of Negotiation with Union Constitutes Condition of Service. The court held that the established custom of negotiation with the union was a condition of service, and its breach, along with non-compliance with the 'last come first go' principle, constituted unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act.

5 May 2006

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Mackinon Mackenzie Ltd. (the appellant/original respondent in the complaint) against the judgment o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Right to Claim Both Gratuity and Retrenchment Compensation; Section 25F(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, interpreted to allow dual benefits.

16 Oct 1959

The dispute originated from an industrial reference between the Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. and its workmen concerning a claim for gratuity. The employe...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)