Search Results for "retirement gratuity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "retirement gratuity"

593 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 593 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Cooperative Society Challenging Gratuity for Post-Retirement Service. Service after superannuation on contract basis not counted for gratuity under Section 4(1) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

7 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Janta Central Wholecell and Retail Cooperative Consumers Stores Ltd., challenged the claim of its former employee, Bansilal Lalchand A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Writ Petitions Challenging CAT's Decision on Retirement Gratuity Effective Date. Employees Who Retired on 31.03.1995 Are Not Entitled to Revised Gratuity Scheme Effective from 01.04.1995 as Per O.M. Dated 14.07.1995.

29 Aug 2012

The case involved two writ petitions filed by the Union of India against orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumbai Bench, which had ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Bank Employee Challenging Discontinuation of Pension in Lieu of Gratuity — Pension Cannot Be Unilaterally Stopped Without Amendment to Service Regulations. The court held that pensionary benefits constitute a package and the bank could not discontinue the petitioner's pension without amending the service regulations, as the petitioner had a vested right to pension under the Pension Rules.

19 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Shapoor M. Mehta, an 87-year-old senior citizen, retired from Allahabad Bank on 30 May 1986 after 39 years of service as a Special Ass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioner's Claim for Balance Gratuity Under VIIth Pay Commission Ceiling. Petitioner restricted claim to Rs.20 lakh ceiling, already paid Rs.9,76,280, balance Rs.10,23,720 directed to be paid with interest.

9 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Dr. Mohammad Modassir, a pensioner and former State Election Commissioner of Goa, filed a writ petition seeking payment of retirement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

4 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Post-Retirement Enquiry and Non-Payment of Gratuity. Employer cannot initiate disciplinary proceedings after superannuation as no employer-employee relationship exists; gratuity cannot be withheld pending enquiry.

5 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Dhairyasheel A. Jadhav, superannuated from the services of Maharashtra Agro Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. on 31.12.2003. On ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim of Retired Employee Despite Pending Regularization and Post-Retirement Chargesheet. Continuous Service of 22 Years Entitles Employee to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Irrespective of Alleged Overage at Joining.

1 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Balvant Mohan Badve, a retired Civil Engineer, joined the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation on 07/09/1985 and superannuated on 01/04/20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Zilla Parishad to Pay Retired Employee Gratuity and Commutation Amount with Interest for Delayed Payment. Non-payment of retiral benefits after superannuation violates Article 300A of the Constitution and Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Motilal s/o Babulal More, retired from the services of the Zilla Parishad, Nandurbar on 31st May 2013 upon attaining the age of supera...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Dismissed Employee's Entitlement to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Dismissal Constitutes 'Retirement' Under Section 2(q) and Forfeiture Requires Specific Order Under Section 4(6) — Employee Entitled to Gratuity Despite Dismissal.

23 Dec 2015

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Chairman cum Managing Director of Western Coalfields Ltd. challenging the entitlement of respondent No....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Order, Holds That Disciplinary Proceedings Not Concluded Before Retirement Do Not Bar Gratuity Payment Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court upheld the Appellate Authority's order directing payment of gratuity to the employee as the disciplinary proceedings were not concluded prior to retirement.

8 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Canara Bank, challenged the order dated 22.12.2020 passed by the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (responde...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)