Search Results for "requisition meeting"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "requisition meeting"

156 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 156 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.

27 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Meeting Rules Apply to No Confidence Motion Meetings Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; No Fresh Meeting Can Be Convened After Expiry of Seven Days on Basis of Illegal Motion. The court ruled that Rule 17 of the Meeting Rules applies to no confidence meetings and that under Section 35(3-B), no direction can be given for a fresh meeting after seven days on an illegal motion.

21 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court addressed two questions of law referred to it concerning the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The first question was whether...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Case. Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 fails as no-confidence motion was validly passed in special meeting presided by Tahsildar under Section 35(3-B) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

29 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Bhaskar s/o Laxmanrao Kadam, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Nivgha (Bazar), Taluka Hadgaon, District Nanded. A special meeting was ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Selection Process for Technical Assistant Posts. Revision of Category-Wise Vacancies After Written Examination Does Not Change Rules of the Game When Done to Fulfill Reservation Mandates.

30 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court heard appeals against a High Court judgment that quashed the selection process for 6628 posts of Technical Assistant (Group-C) in th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2014

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Gram Panchayat Elections — Upholds Validity of Election Process Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court holds that election of members of Gram Panchayat cannot be challenged after declaration of results except by an election petition under Section 15 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals (LPA No.203 of 2011 and LPA No.204 of 2011) filed against the orders of a learned Single Judge of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

24 Jan 2014

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction EGM in Company Dispute. Court Holds That Requisition for EGM Under Section 169 of Companies Act, 1956 Is Valid Despite Pending Oppression Petitions and That Board's Failure to Call Meeting Within 21 Days Entitles Requisitionists to Call Meeting Themselves.

24 Jul 2013

The case involves a dispute between two groups of shareholders in Man Industries (I) Ltd., represented by two brothers, Ramesh Mansukhani (supporting ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Recall of Elected Representatives Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 — Labour Officer's Order Upheld for Lack of Sufficient Reasons in Recall Requisition.

7 Dec 2006

The petitioners, Mahindra and Mahindra Employees' Union and its members, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chairman's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Agriculture Produce Market Committee Case — Notice of Motion Held Valid Despite Absence of Some Directors' Signatures. Court Declines to Interfere with Statutory Proceedings Under Section 14(4) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, Directs Petitioner to Raise Objections Before Presiding Officer.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dinesh Sheshrao Thakre, was the Chairman of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol. He filed a writ petition challenging the ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)