Search Results for "repeal and saving"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State of Goa's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute, Upholding Rejection of Objections Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The State of Goa appealed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the rejection of its objections under Section 34 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Dispute Reference Under Repealed Act. Reference Order Saved by Savings Clause in Industrial Relations Code, 2020 and Section 6 of General Clauses Act, 1897 as It Was Made When Old Act Was in Force.

The dispute arose when Glastronix LLP, the petitioner, challenged a reference order dated 19.12.2025 issued by the Labour Department, Government of Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Criminal Petition Challenging Cognizance Order in Cheque Dishonour Case - BNSS, 2023 Procedure Not Applicable to Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Proceedings

The petitioners challenged the order of taking cognizance in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, contending...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Dismissal Case, Reinstating Dismissal Order Quashed by High Court. The Court Held That Approval of Charge-Sheet by Competent Authority at Issuance Stage Is Not Mandatory If Initiation of Proceedings Was Approved, Under Civil Services Rules and Precedents.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a civil service officer in Jharkhand following disciplinary proceedings for misconduct involving dishonesty, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"A Case Examining Limitation and Arbitration in Franchise Disputes."

The Supreme Court ruled on the issue of whether the arbitration petition filed by Arif Azim Co. Ltd. was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Food Adulteration Case: Remand Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. High Court's order setting aside conviction and ordering retrial against company without notice violates Section 401(2) CrPC.

The Supreme Court allowed two appeals arising from a High Court order that set aside the conviction of a nominated officer of Hindustan Unilever Limit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...