Search Results for "remand orders"

1619 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1619 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Civil Suit Remand Case — Remand Order Set Aside as Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 41 Rule 23A CPC. The appellate court cannot remand a suit for retrial when the trial court has already decided it on merits without any procedural irregularity.

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 22 March 2022 passed by the District Judge, Raigad, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 22 A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in SFIO Case — Remand Orders Valid Despite Cognizance Issue. Court holds that remand orders under Section 167 Cr.P.C. are independent of cognizance and not subject to challenge under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after filing of complaint.

The applicant, Hari Sankaran, was arrested by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) on 1 April 2019 for an offence punishable under Section 44...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Activist in UAPA Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and the period of house arrest cannot be excluded from the computation of the 90-day period.

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, a 69-year-old scholar, writer, and civil rights activist, was arrested on 28/10/2018 in connection with FIR No. 4 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in Customs Act Detention Case — Detention Held Not Illegal. Petitioner's arrest under Section 104 of Customs Act, 1962 and subsequent judicial custody were lawful; no violation of Articles 14, 21, 22 of Constitution found.

The petitioner, Ankit Ghanshyam Mutha, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus and direction for his release from custody of the Directo...