Search Results for "religious pandal"

7 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Frivolous PIL Seeking Multiple Unrelated Directions Including Anti-Organized Crime Unit, Cow Farms, and Cave Temple Commission. Petition Filed by Self-Styled Criminologist Lacks Factual Basis and Legal Foundation, Wasting Judicial Time.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Crimeophobia – A Criminology Firm through its founder, Snehil Dhall, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ganesh Idol Installation and Road Closure. Temporary road closure for religious festival is permissible under police powers and municipal byelaws, balancing public convenience and religious sentiments.

The petitioners, residents and a builder, filed a writ petition challenging the installation of a Ganesh idol and the closure of a road in Pune by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Rampant Illegal Hoardings by Political and Religious Entities Across Maharashtra. Court Interprets Definition of Skysign and Requirement of Written Permission Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay was seized with a group of Public Interest Litigations and Writ Petitions raising serious concerns regarding th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Succession and Adverse Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellant failed to prove title or adverse possession over suit property.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Custodio Gama, against the judgment and decree of the District C...