Search Results for "regularization order"

443 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 443 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Commissioner's Order on Building Proposal Validity — Held That Commissioner's Decision Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Is Final and Not Subject to Judicial Review on Merits.

The petitioner, M/s Mahendra Builders, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition for Regularization of Services Due to Delay and Laches — Petitioner Superannuated Without Regularization Despite Resolution. Writ of Mandamus Denied as Relief Became Infructuous After Superannuation.

The petitioner, Vinodrai Gordhandas Agrawal, was appointed as a Sanitary Inspector by the Porbandar Nagar Palika on 21.04.1997 and superannuated on 31...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Regularization of Ad-hoc Employees in Ambedkar Nagar Judgeship — One-Time Measure Under Umadevi Principles. Appellants appointed prior to 31.12.2001 and serving for over 10 years held entitled to regularization despite interim orders.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Rajnish Kumar Mishra and others, who were ad-hoc employees of the Ambedkar Nagar Judgeship in Uttar Pra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Regularization of Casual Workers. Regularization of Seniors Upheld but Direction for Absorption in Other Establishments Set Aside.

The Union of India appealed against a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which upheld a direction of the Central Administrative Tribunal to regulari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against SSRD Orders in Land Regularization Case. SSRD's Directions for Regularization Based on Auction Price Upheld as Within Jurisdiction Under Rule 108(6) of Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972.

The dispute originated from the allotment of government land in 1967 to M/s. Nav Bharat Potteries Ltd. for a pottery industry at a concessional rate, ...