Search Results for "refund rejection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "refund rejection"

316 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes GST Appellate Order Against Indian Oil Corporation for Violation of Natural Justice — Pre-deposit Requirement Set Aside. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Renders Appellate Order Unsustainable Under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioner, M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in storage and supply of petroleum products, filed a writ petitio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition on Interest on Refund Under Goa VAT Act — Interest Payable from Date of Assessment Order Determining Refund. Section 33(2) of the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 mandates interest from the date the amount became refundable, which is the date of the assessment order, not the date of actual refund.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, United Spirits Ltd. (formerly McDowell and Co. Ltd.), a registered dealer under the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005, filed returns for t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of CVD Paid on Imported Mobile Phones Under Exemption Notification. The court held that the exemption notification No.12/2012-Customs applies to imports and directed reconsideration of refund claims subject to verification of unjust enrichment.

30 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Micromax Informatics Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, imported mobile handsets during July 2014 to June 2015 and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Interest on Customs Refund. Petitioner entitled to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 from the date of expiry of three months from the date of receipt of the refund order.

16 Sep 2016

The Petitioner, Shelf Drilling International Inc. (formerly Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc.), filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the C...

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference in Sales Tax Classification Case — PVC Pipes Not Agricultural Machinery. Assessee Entitled to Refund of Excess Tax Collected Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

19 Aug 2005

The case involves two sales tax references under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the assessee, M/s. Patankar Broth...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Accumulated Input Tax Credit Under Inverted Duty Structure in GST — Rejection by Authorities Set Aside. Held that refund of unutilized ITC is admissible under Section 54(3)(ii) of the CGST Act, 2017 even when output supply is partially exempt, and that the formula under Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017 must be applied correctly.

23 Apr 2026

The petitioner, CHEC-TPL Line 4 Joint Venture, a joint venture between TATA Projects Limited and another entity, was engaged in the construction of a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

High Court Orders Tax Authority to Refund Rs. 10.69 Crores to Petitioner. Court rules in favor of the Petitioner, mandates refund with interest due to improper adjustment of dues.

9 Jul 2024

The case of a tax refund dispute, the Petitioner sought the refund of Rs. 10,69,89,606/- for the year 2011-2012. The Respondents had adjusted this ref...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)