Search Results for "rectification proceedings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "rectification proceedings"

278 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 278 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Companies Act and SEBI Regulations Jurisdiction Dispute. The court held that rectificatory jurisdiction under Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 is summary and not for contested facts, and SEBI has exclusive jurisdiction over violations of its regulations, not the National Company Law Tribunal.

4 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal concerning the rectificatory jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 59 of the Comp...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in Trademark Infringement Case, Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Stay Suit Pending Rectification. Civil Court Has Concurrent Jurisdiction to Decide Infringement and Validity of Trademark Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

13 Sep 2024

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Laxmi Balaji Industries and M/s. Sri Laxmi Vinayaka Rice Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Rectification of GST Returns in Error Period. The Court affirmed that circulars restricting rectification of Form GSTR-3B to net basis adjustments are inconsistent with GST laws and that rectification must be permitted in the period of error occurrence under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

28 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi dated 05.05.2020 in W.P. (C) No. 6345 of 2018, which allowed a writ petition filed by Bhar...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Order Denying Tax Appropriation and Rectification of Returns. Court Quashes Impugned Order as Without Jurisdiction and Permits Rectification of GST Returns Since Tax Paid Exceeded Proposed Input Tax Credit Reversal with No Revenue Loss Under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

8 Jan 2026

The dispute involved writ petitions challenging GST authorities' orders denying appropriation of tax paid and refusing rectification of returns. The p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in Sales Tax Exemption Dispute. Revisional Authority Under Section 57 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Has Power to Set Aside Refund Orders Granted Under Section 62 When Exemption Notification Does Not Apply.

6 Jun 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv Shyam Sales Enterprises, a partnership firm dealing in gas hot plates as importer and retailer, filed a writ petition under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Section 57 of Bombay Sales Tax Act — Refund of Tax on Gas Hot Plates Upheld as Exempted Goods Under Entry 164[1][v]. The court held that the Assistant Commissioner erred in revising the refund order without properly considering the exemption notification, and the petitioner was entitled to refund of tax paid on exempted goods.

6 Jun 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv Shyam Sales Enterprises, a partnership firm dealing in gas hot plates as importer and retailer, filed a writ petition under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds IPAB Order Expunging Trademark 'Creative' for Deceptive Similarity in Travel Services. Petitioner's mark 'Creative Tours & Travels' held deceptively similar to respondent's registered mark 'Creative Travel', causing confusion among consumers under Section 9(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

4 May 2016

The petitioner, Creative Tours & Travels (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Nov 2025

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment in Plaint and Agreement in Specific Performance Suit. Court Has Power Under Section 26 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 to Rectify Instrument to Correct Clerical Error in Gat Number.

12 Dec 2011

The present writ petition was filed by the original defendant challenging the order of the trial court allowing the plaintiff's application for amendm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Bid in Mining Lease e-Auction, Orders Fresh Auction and Penalty. Supreme Court finds error in 140.10% bid to be a genuine mistake, mandates a fresh e-auction while imposing a Rs 3 crore penalty on appellant for lack of due care.

15 Jul 2024

Granted leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Orissa, which dismissed the writ petition of the appellant who had mistakenly placed...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)