Search Results for "recovery impermissible"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Appointment Norms of Information Commissioners ...
Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench the Question of Quashing Non-Compoundable O...

Search Results for "recovery impermissible"

617 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 617 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Agricultural Officer for Excess Pension Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Prolonged Delay. Recovery of Inadvertently Paid Excess Pension Without Misrepresentation or Fraud Held Impermissible Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

21 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a former Agricultural Officer, retired on 30.04.2014 and was receiving a monthly pension of Rs.43,921 under PPO No.RO-713261. The resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

25 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Widow Against Recovery of Excess Payment from Deceased Employee's Pension. Recovery from Legal Heirs Based on Employee's Undertaking Held Impermissible as Excess Payment Was Due to Employer's Mistake Without Misrepresentation.

27 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Sudha wd/o Bhagirath Meshram, is the widow of a deceased employee who worked as a Junior Lecturer at Zilla Parishad High School. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.

22 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.

22 Dec 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Civil Imprisonment Order Against Guarantor in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Failure to Comply with Section 30 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. Court holds that Recovery Officer cannot order arrest without issuing a show-cause notice and giving an opportunity of hearing as mandated by the Act.

11 Apr 2017

The petitioners, including Panther Fincap & Management Services Limited and three individuals, were aggrieved by an order dated 31 May 2007 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

30 Jul 2013

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate Satisfaction Orders in Cooperative Bank Dispute. Special Recovery Officer lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate on validity of recovery certificates or order refund under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

4 Oct 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Vilas Transport Co., a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cooperative Bank's Writ Petitions Challenging Recovery Certificate and Auction Sale — Upholds Validity of Sale Certificate Issued Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that the sale certificate under Section 99 is conclusive evidence of title and the recovery certificate under Section 101 is final and binding, barring writ jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Sangli Sahakari Bank Ltd., a cooperative bank registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed three writ petit...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)