Search Results for "reasonable probable view"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "reasonable probable view"

1363 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1363 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

9 Jul 2026

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Tax Revision Against Tribunal Order Restoring Equal Addition and Penalty Under TNVAT Act, 2006. Taxpayer Argues Stock Variation Computed from Notional Trading Method Without Physical Verification Cannot Sustain Penalty Under Section 27(3)(c).

6 Jul 2026

The case involved a tax revision petition filed by M/s. Vista Garments, a registered dealer under the CGST Act, 2017, engaged in manufacturing hosiery...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Last Seen Theory and Discovery Evidence Found Insufficient. Court Holds That Gaps in Chain of Circumstances and Lack of Corroboration Render Conviction Unsafe Under Sections 302, 364, 404, 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

27 Apr 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Karnataka High Court, which had affirmed the conviction of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Successful Rebuttal of Presumptions and Unjustified Appellate Interference. The Court held that the accused raised a probable defence under Sections 118(a) and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the High Court erred in overturning the Trial Court's acquittal as the findings were not perverse.

22 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant alleged lending Rs. 20,00,000...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Conviction Due to Insufficient Rebuttal of Presumption. The Court held that the accused successfully raised a probable defence by questioning the complainant's financial capacity and the circumstances of the loan, thereby rebutting the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

27 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the accused against the High Court of Karnataka's judgment convicting him under Section 138 of the Negotiabl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Complainant's Failure to Prove Debt. High Court's Reversal Set Aside as Trial Court's Findings on Rebuttal of Presumption Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

27 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had reversed his acquitta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

31 Jan 2018

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

High Court

KAHC010422252008_1

17 Dec 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

17 Dec 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Malicious Prosecution — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Malice and Absence of Reasonable and Probable Cause. The court held that the plaintiff must establish both malice and lack of reasonable and probable cause for the prosecution, and that the acquittal in the criminal case does not automatically entitle the plaintiff to damages.

27 Apr 2005

The plaintiff, Shyam Sunder Bubna, filed a suit for malicious prosecution against M/s. Savani Transport Private Limited and its branch manager, Akhtar...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)