Search Results for "re-employed officer"

26 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Reemployment of CMD of Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited. Court holds that reemployment policy for CPSEs is governed by DPE guidelines, not Handbook for Personnel Officers.

The petitioner, a retired accountant and public-spirited citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Casual Worker in BSNL Case — 50% Back Wages Upheld. Continuous Service of 371 Days Over 13 Months Constitutes Regular Employment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), challenged an award dated 12.11.2003 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits for Temporary Employee in Agricultural University Service Matter — Half of Temporary Service Counted Towards Pension as Per Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Vithal Tukaram Londhe, joined the Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krushi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, as a temporary labourer on 24.04.1997. He wor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Sub-Inspector in Police Act Case — Superintendent of Police Holds Same Authority as District Superintendent. Re-employed Deputy Superintendent of Police Qualifies as Superior Officer for Departmental Enquiry Under Punjab Police Rules, 1934.

Background: The case concerned the dismissal of a Sub-Inspector of Police from service by the Delhi Police Force in 1949. The respondent, originally a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MSRTC's 'Kutumb Suraksha Yojna' Scheme for Re-appointing Terminated/Suspended Conductors as Arbitrary and Unconstitutional. Scheme Allowing Re-appointment of Conductors Charged with Misappropriation of Funds Violates Public Interest and Article 14 of the Constitution.

The Bombay High Court, in a suo motu public interest litigation, examined the validity of the 'Kutumb Suraksha Yojna' scheme introduced by the Maharas...