Search Results for "purification"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeal in Purification Activity Case — Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Judicial Indiscipline. Purification of excise duty paid goods on job work basis does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Tribunal bound by precedents.

The Bombay High Court disposed of Central Excise Appeal No.179 of 2014 and Civil Writ Petition No.279 of 2015 by a common order. The appellant, Sunbel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in 50:50 Joint Venture Due to Availability of Buy-Out Remedy. Loss of mutual trust and confidence does not automatically justify winding up under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 when one party is willing to purchase the other's shares.

The petitioner, Severn Trent Water Purification Inc, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 against Capital Contr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Petitioner Challenging Tender Rejection by KPTCL - No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Battery Energy Storage System Tender Process

The petitioner, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of its bid in a tender process...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrators in Brewing Agreement Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Failure of Appointed Arbitrator to Constitute Tribunal Justifies Court Intervention.

The petitioner, Anheuser Busch InBev India Limited, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute. n-Hexane Held to be a Separate Chemical Compound, Not Petroleum Oil, Under Customs Tariff Heading 2901.10 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2901.90.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, against the decision of CESTAT, Ahmedabad, which had dismissed the Revenue's appea...