Search Results for "protected employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "protected employee"

440 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 440 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Labour Commissioner's Order Recognizing Protected Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Object to Union's Nominees Upheld Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Conciliation Officer Must Consider Employer's Objections and Pass Reasoned Order Under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

17 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Tata Marcopolo Motors Limited, is a registered company with a factory in Belur Industrial Area, Dharwad. Some of its employees are mem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Preliminary Issue Framing in Employee Status Dispute. The Industrial Court Correctly Held That the Question of Whether an Employee is an 'Employee' Under the MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Decided as a Preliminary Issue as It Involves Mixed Questions of Fact and Law.

10 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (employer), challenged the judgment and order dated November 13, 2021 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal Order Reinstating Teacher with 50% Back Wages in Termination Dispute. Management's claim of abandonment of service rejected as termination letter was issued without proper inquiry.

19 Apr 2022

The petitioners, Late Sanjay Gandhi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Shri Rajeshwar Secondary School and Junior College (collectively 'Management'), chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

21 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Gratuity Dispute — Trust Deed and Scheme Capped Gratuity at Statutory Limit Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employer's Gratuity Scheme Did Not Abandon Statutory Ceiling; Employee Entitled Only to Statutory Maximum.

29 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between BCH Electric Limited (appellant-employer) and Pradeep Mehra (respondent-employee) regarding the quantum of gra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Setting Aside Termination with Retrospective Effect. Termination of Employee with Retrospective Effect from Date of Medical Unfitness Held Illegal as It Deprives Employee of Opportunity to Be Heard.

7 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 22.08.2017 allowing Complaint ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Five Workmen as Protected Workmen — Trade Union Must Be Registered Under Trade Unions Act, 1926 to Claim Protection Under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court held that an unregistered trade union cannot seek declaration of its office bearers as protected workmen under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Nov 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Wonderla Holidays Limited, a public limited company running amusement parks, challenged an order dated 16.09.2017 passed by the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Education Society Challenging Quashing of Teacher's Termination. Termination Based on Alleged Caste Fraud Set Aside as Employee's Caste Certificate Was Valid and No Misrepresentation Proven.

2 Apr 2016

The petitioners, Pratibha Niketan Education Society and Pratibha Niketan High School, Nanded, challenged the judgment and order dated 21/08/2015 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition, Quashes Stay on Second Show Cause Notice in Disciplinary Proceeding. Labour Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Interfering at Pre-Decision Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

5 Dec 2015

The Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation (Petitioner) challenged the order dated 29.07.2015 of the Labour Court at Nanded in Complaint (ULP) No.1...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)