Search Results for "proprietorship GST demand"

24 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Provisional Attachment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Attachment of Bank Accounts and Property Without Prior Hearing Held Invalid Under Section 79(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Navin Vishwanathan, proprietor of M/s. Oriental Facility, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 300A of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Composite Show Cause Notice Issued Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Multiple Tax Periods

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development and registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging GST Demand and Rejection of Revocation of Registration — Petitioner Failed to Prove Receipt of Goods and Payment to Supplier Under Section 16(2) of CGST Act, 2017. Input Tax Credit Denied as Burden of Proof Not Discharged.

The petitioner, a proprietorship firm engaged in exporting mobile handsets and registered under the CGST Act, 2017, filed applications for refund of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Detention Orders for Lack of Proper Adjudication. Principles of Natural Justice Violated as Show Cause Notices Were Issued Without Considering Petitioner's Reply.

The petitioner, M/s. Vinod Metal and M/s. Vinod Steel, proprietorship and HUF concerns of Vinodkumar Velraj Mehta, filed multiple writ petitions under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Cancellation Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Registration Cancelled Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing, Set Aside with Restoration.

The petitioner, Rawman Metal & Alloys, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...